qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iotests: drop unnecessary accel=kvm


From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iotests: drop unnecessary accel=kvm
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:11:51 +0000

19.02.2019 15:02, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 19/02/2019 12.59, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> Tests 235 and 238 do not require the kvm accelerator.  TCG works fine.
>>
>> Use the default accelerator instead of requiring kvm.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>   tests/qemu-iotests/235 | 1 -
>>   tests/qemu-iotests/238 | 1 -
>>   2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/235 b/tests/qemu-iotests/235
>> index d6edd97ab4..329da8f0c2 100755
>> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/235
>> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/235
>> @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ qemu_img_create('-f', iotests.imgfmt, '-o', 
>> 'preallocation=metadata', disk,
>>                   str(size))
>>   
>>   vm = QEMUMachine(iotests.qemu_prog)
>> -vm.add_args('-machine', 'accel=kvm')
> 
> According to the initial commit log of 235:
> 
>   "iotests: simple mirror test with kvm on 1G image"
> 
> ... so I assume KVM was used on purpose here?
> 
>   Thomas
> 

As I remember kvm is not really necessary, and test have a comment about it:
# And it didn't reproduce if at least one of the following:
...
# 3. drop kvm and use iotests.VM() (maybe, because of qtest) (however, it still
#    reproduces, if just drop kvm, but gdb failed to produce full backtraces
#    for me)

But the comment should be updated with this patch.

-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]