[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner: Don'
From: |
Andreas Färber |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner: Don't overrun output_irq array in init |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 02:17:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
Am 17.02.2014 18:53, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> The Exynos4210 combiner has IIC_NIRQ inputs and IIC_NGRP outputs;
> use the correct constant in the loop initializing our output
> sysbus IRQs so that we don't overrun the output_irq[] array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner.c b/hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner.c
> index ef5e8eb..3287479 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner.c
> @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static int exynos4210_combiner_init(SysBusDevice *sbd)
> qdev_init_gpio_in(dev, exynos4210_combiner_handler, IIC_NIRQ);
>
> /* Connect SysBusDev irqs to device specific irqs */
> - for (i = 0; i < IIC_NIRQ; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < IIC_NGRP; i++) {
Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <address@hidden>
It seems that IIC_NIRQ == IIC_NGRP * 8, so please don't forget to Cc
address@hidden in the commit message for 1.7.1.
Regards,
Andreas
> sysbus_init_irq(sbd, &s->output_irq[i]);
> }
>
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
- Re: [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner: Don't overrun output_irq array in init,
Andreas Färber <=