|
From: | Marcin Kłapkowski |
Subject: | Re: [RP] Graphics efficiency in ratpoison |
Date: | Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:45:26 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103) |
Antti Nykänen pisze:
I didn't know that size of screen is important. I checked fluxbox now, with glxgears -fullscreen and I got results close to ratpoison. You had right.Hi, Marcin Kłapkowski wrote:I'm not chating.Were the glxgears windows in ratpoison and fluxbox the same size? Rendering a full-screen glxgears is significantly slower.- Antti _______________________________________________ Ratpoison-devel mailing list address@hidden http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ratpoison-devel
68 frames in 5.1 seconds = 13.419 FPS 66 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13.128 FPS 66 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13.104 FPS 66 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13.107 FPS 66 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13.102 FPS 66 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13.105 FPS Now, only one thing is that workspaces make graphics a little slower. But this wasn't point of my mail. My mislead, sorry for bothering. Thanks.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |