rule-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Rule-list] minimum rule install


From: Devon
Subject: Re: [Rule-list] minimum rule install
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 13:10:18 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 29 March 2002 02:20 am, Marco Fioretti wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 00:06:23 at 12:06:23AM -0800, James wrote:
> > This sounds like a paper and pencil type job... If I could get a
> > copy of rpm -qa on the box with the 248 install I can start checking
> > out what needs what and see just how far down I can get it without
> > having to rebuild rpms.
>
> James,
> no need to restart from scratch on this: in the first ten days or so
> of the list we already discussed (partly) this issue, check in the
> archives.

To begin tracking down the big disk usage packages, attached is a log 
created while installing the base packages, the net tools packages, and 
openshh server packages.
I ran 'df -h /' before installing anything, and then again after each 
package was installed. (added the lines to the installer script)

I assume the disk usage at the start is the result of the percentage of 
disk reserved for root, plus the space occupied by the installer binaries.

By the way, this log was created while doing an HTTP install booted with 
'linux mem=6M'

- -D

- -- 

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/pgpkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.2 in 6M of RAM: http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/rule/

- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8pf+KeMAUbzJhSVcRAuiAAJ9pYQ3aAuC1QKzMDvobxIXpwtlkjgCbBke3
r5lQsxwYxSeaDREDx2iRidU=
=flA3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: install_log
Description: Text document


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]