[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Savannah-hackers] [ 100675 ] Sorcerer account

From: nobody
Subject: [Savannah-hackers] [ 100675 ] Sorcerer account
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 10:51:51 -0500

Support Request #100675, was updated on 2002-Mar-30 02:00
You can respond by visiting:

Category: None
Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Summary: Sorcerer account

By: yeupou
Date: 2002-Mar-30 16:51

Logged In: YES 
Browser: Mozilla/4.78 [fr] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7-10 i586; Nav)

Actually, we have no "current standing". We have received an
email from Kyle, we have seen that it has been a strange
policy on user administration on this project recently.

If we should (this is my point of view, not the savannah
one) make a decision we should know the point-of-view of any
developpers that have been associated with this project on
savannah (on one common mail, why not).

Anything I have rode recently about sorcerer GNU Linux seems
really strange to me.

BTW, the problem need discussing, I dont think that a normal
request, I dont think the problem is related to savannah but
mainly related to sorcerer GNU Linux forked/not_forked.
About this, you should write your sentiments at


By: David.Huff
Date: 2002-Mar-30 02:00

Logged In: NO 
Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020323

I'm not sure where to start without coming off like a rant.

I do know as a fact the group that is currently using
the Sorcerer account is a fork that decided to only
rename itself Sorcerer GNU'/'Linux instead of Sorcerer
GNU Linux. They have literally stolen the identity of
Kyle Sallee's work.

If I pointed you to two sites where the current project
leader admitted that he had pre-planned the fork, would
you reconsider your current standing?

I know that you don't want to be involved with this
mess at all. But somehow you have already come to the
conclusion you have. I would like to know what kind of
evidence has brought you to your current conclusions?

Thank you for your time,

Dave Huff

You can respond by visiting:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]