[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Simulavr-devel] [semi-OT] mailing list posting
From: |
qmax |
Subject: |
[Simulavr-devel] [semi-OT] mailing list posting |
Date: |
Thu Sep 12 15:31:02 2002 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Hi.
I was replying messages in list using 'Reply' command,
but there's no "Reply-To: <mailing-list-addr>" in header,
thus messages gone to original message sender given in "From".
Theodore used 'Reply to all' command, which sends message
both to "From" and "Cc" making it double recieved by original
sender (me in that case), and all that stuff.
Why not to specify "Reply-to: <simulavr-devel-addr>", as
it is done in other mailing lists, to avoid such confusions ?
I've just figured this out.
Locally fixed by seting up mutt to recognize this particular
mailing list and using 'List reply' command instead of reflectory 'Reply'.
--
qMax
- [Simulavr-devel] [semi-OT] mailing list posting,
qmax <=