[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] StumpWM port to LispWorks 6.x
From: |
Shawn Betts |
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] StumpWM port to LispWorks 6.x |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Oct 2012 11:57:33 -0700 |
>> I think all those patches in your branch wrapped into a single
>> one--minus the unrelated formatting changes--would be okay.
>
>
> Did the latest commit 13cd2eb fix that? :) As I can see now the only changes
> left (I checked the diff between master and lispworks branches) are only
> related to LispWorks port.
Yes, I think the last one did it, though I didn't look closely. But if
I pull from your branch now I would get 4 patches, not 1 nice and
clean one.
> As for the explicit Quicklisp loading code (that may seem to be unrelated)
> in make-image.lisp.in and manual.lisp, LispWorks doesn't read a user's init
> script before calling eval from a command line or saving/delivering an image
> so we have to load Quicklisp/ASDF first.
That's probably fine as long as it only affects lispworks.
-Shawn
- [STUMP] StumpWM port to LispWorks 6.x, Kamil Shakirov, 2012/10/15
- Re: [STUMP] StumpWM port to LispWorks 6.x, Shawn Betts, 2012/10/15
- Re: [STUMP] StumpWM port to LispWorks 6.x, Kamil Shakirov, 2012/10/15
- Re: [STUMP] StumpWM port to LispWorks 6.x, Shawn Betts, 2012/10/15
- Re: [STUMP] StumpWM port to LispWorks 6.x, Kamil Shakirov, 2012/10/15
- Re: [STUMP] StumpWM port to LispWorks 6.x,
Shawn Betts <=
- Re: [STUMP] StumpWM port to LispWorks 6.x, Kamil Shakirov, 2012/10/15
- Re: [STUMP] StumpWM port to LispWorks 6.x, Shawn Betts, 2012/10/15
- Re: [STUMP] StumpWM port to LispWorks 6.x, Kamil Shakirov, 2012/10/16
- Re: [STUMP] StumpWM port to LispWorks 6.x, Shawn Betts, 2012/10/16
Re: [STUMP] StumpWM port to LispWorks 6.x, Michael Raskin, 2012/10/15