[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Swarm-Modelling] 2 easyish questions
From: |
Vinny Reynolds |
Subject: |
[Swarm-Modelling] 2 easyish questions |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:20:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Opera7.23/Linux M2 build 518 |
Hi
I'm doing a kind of a state of the art review simulation technologies,
with a view to developing a pervasive computing simulator.
One of the simulators I identified as being useful is SWARM.
I've read a lot of the documentation and I have one or two questions that
I cant seem to find the answer to.
Can anybody help,.....
Agents and Swarms seem to be equivalent to a degree and are structured
hierarchically. Events can be scheduled for individual agents or for
Swarms
compromising of agents and/or more swarms. Say for example, you place 1
set of rabbits in one particular swarm, and another set of rabbits in
another swarm. The two sets of rabbits are in physically different places,
which is why I'm seperating them into two swarms. Now, rabbits being
rabbits like to move around and my first question is this. If a rabbit
moves and more appropriately belongs to another swarm, can that agent and
its events be moved transparently? Or, does it have to be treated in a
special manner because it is no longer part of swarm one and therefore is
no longer bound by that groups behaviour?
The world is modelled as an agent, albeit one with special meaning but
treated by the simulator as an agent nonetheless. My second question is
has
anybody found that this places any undue limitations on their model of the
world or is the agent paradigm sufficient and flexible enough? How did
you get around any such limitations
Can anyone help...
Thanks in advance,
Vinny
--
Vinny Reynolds
Distributed Systems Group
Trinity College Dublin
00353 608-1531
I use M2, Opera's Email client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
- [Swarm-Modelling] 2 easyish questions,
Vinny Reynolds <=