Re: [Swarm-Modelling] Question

[Miles Parker]

Yeah..I was thinking thinking of taking just the parts of the compiler  
that got you to a tree, but this is even better. The Eclipse APT stuff  
does *some* of this, but not I believe to the level of operations.  
OTOH, I'd really want to be able to parse the isolated C bits, e.g.  
from the xml, not the generated code -- dunno if that would be  
possible w/ this approach.

On Mar 20, 2008, at 4:05 PM, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:

> Miles Parker wrote:
> > One could also go the other way, though part of that would be hard  
> > to automate as there does appear to be explicit C code in the xml  
> > representation which one would need to parse.
> It seems like something worth contemplating.. I mean, how to  
> incrementally migrate imperative models to a declarative system like  
> MetaABM..  One wouldn't need to parse such code if the compiler did  
> it for you..
>
> http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~mmccrack/lens/LENS-TR-Intro.pdf
> _______________________________________________
> Modelling mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://www.swarm.org/mailman/listinfo/modelling