[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problem making swarm-1.4.1 (-O3) under rh6.0
From: |
Rick Riolo |
Subject: |
Re: problem making swarm-1.4.1 (-O3) under rh6.0 |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Jun 1999 12:54:49 -0400 (EDT) |
Marcus,
The original syntax DOES work with -O2 (and no -g).
It does NOT work with -O3 and no -g.
Interestingly, this version which you suggested:
const char*
skip_typespec (const char *intype)
{
const char *type = skip_type_qualifiers (intype);
does NOT work with the default -O2 -g , either!!!
------
Paul,
Note that this is not the same problem as the argp.h problem.
I'll get back to you about that in a different message.
(after I read more about your patching experience...we have
made from scratch a version with some of your patches,
but I guess not all of them.) (I'm not a fan of rpm's,
I like to roll my own as much as possible.)
- r
Rick Riolo address@hidden
Center for Study of Complex Systems (CSCS)
4477 Randall Lab
University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI 48109-1120
Phone: 734 763 3323 Fax: 734 763 9267
http://www.pscs.umich.edu/PEOPLE/rlr-home.html
On 3 Jun 1999, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
> Date: 03 Jun 1999 09:02:06 -0700
> From: Marcus G. Daniels <address@hidden>
> Reply-To: address@hidden
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: problem making swarm-1.4.1 (-O3) under rh6.0
>
> >>>>> "RLR" == Rick Riolo <address@hidden> writes:
>
> RLR> It doesn't seem to work, nor does a couple of other variants I
> RLR> tried
>
> Lovely. Does it occur with -O2?
>
> (You didn't get this Paul?)
>
> ==================================
> Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
> to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
> [un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
> with "help" in the body of the message.
>
>
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.