[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch
From: |
Marcus G. Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch |
Date: |
21 Jul 2000 10:22:39 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.070084 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.84) Emacs/20.4 |
>>>>> "RLR" == Rick Riolo <address@hidden> writes:
RLR> does this note from you imply if i just install the right
RLR> binutils, i don't need to patch gcc
No, GCC isn't doing the right thing, and at one point binutils
accomodated that...this is just to say that a warning isn't a sure thing
across systems.
RLR> of course, if i need to do the gcc patch, i need to do the patch,
RLR> and that's what i'll do.
If you can tolerate the warnings, you don't need the patch.
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0), (continued)
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0), Marcus G. Daniels, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0), Rick Riolo, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0), Paul E Johnson, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0), Marcus G. Daniels, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch, Rick Riolo, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch, Marcus G. Daniels, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch, Rick Riolo, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch,
Marcus G. Daniels <=
- Re: (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch and binutils, Rick Riolo, 2000/07/21
- Re: (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch and binutils, Marcus G. Daniels, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch, Paul Johnson, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch, Rick Riolo, 2000/07/21