[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch and binutils
From: |
Rick Riolo |
Subject: |
Re: (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch and binutils |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:29:28 -0400 (EDT) |
marcus,
ok, thanks for the info.
i can't tolerate the warnings,
so i need the patch...i've got it from
ftp://ftp.swarm.org/pub/swarm/src/needed/diffs/
so let me know if that's not the right one.
Also, we have
binutils-2.9.1.0.23
Do you have a recommend binutils for us to upgrade to?
(Maybe it should be listed under needed-software?)
thanks.
- r
Rick Riolo address@hidden
Center for Study of Complex Systems (CSCS)
4477 Randall Lab
University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI 48109-1120
Phone: 734 763 3323 Fax: 734 763 9267
http://www.pscs.umich.edu/PEOPLE/rlr-home.html
On 21 Jul 2000, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
> Date: 21 Jul 2000 10:22:39 -0700
> From: Marcus G. Daniels <address@hidden>
> Reply-To: address@hidden
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch
>
> >>>>> "RLR" == Rick Riolo <address@hidden> writes:
>
> RLR> does this note from you imply if i just install the right
> RLR> binutils, i don't need to patch gcc
>
> No, GCC isn't doing the right thing, and at one point binutils
> accomodated that...this is just to say that a warning isn't a sure thing
> across systems.
>
> RLR> of course, if i need to do the gcc patch, i need to do the patch,
> RLR> and that's what i'll do.
>
> If you can tolerate the warnings, you don't need the patch.
>
> ==================================
> Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
> to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
> [un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
> with "help" in the body of the message.
>
>
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0), (continued)
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0), Rick Riolo, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0), Paul E Johnson, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0), Marcus G. Daniels, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch, Rick Riolo, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch, Marcus G. Daniels, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch, Rick Riolo, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch, Marcus G. Daniels, 2000/07/21
- Re: (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch and binutils,
Rick Riolo <=
- Re: (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch and binutils, Marcus G. Daniels, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch, Paul Johnson, 2000/07/21
- Re: problem making swarm2.1.1 (redhat 6.0) -- the gcc patch, Rick Riolo, 2000/07/21