I know it runs on a Macbook 7,1 and I think I am running it on a Macbook 4,1 now. I have had problems in both laptops with my mouse only moving up and down in 3 out of 4 boots, but now I've switched
Sorry for duplicated email.. We have been working with Chris Marusich, Efraim and numerous others on porting GNU Guix to PowerPC 64-bits, I think both are not contradictory. I have a Talos II desktop
I run Fedora currently because that's where the support came first and I think that's where it's best still since Red Hat markets a product that supports the platform commercially as well. But today
Are you running Debian on the PowerPC? I assume Debian's got the best PowerPC support. Do most programs compile ok/work ok for Debian? Please do consider setting up a patreon/librepay account! Market
Hi Mark, Thank you for letting me know about this. I didn't know about the difference between "--batch" and "--force". I agree we should use "--force" instead of "--batch". How do you recommend that
I finally found some time to clean-up my work. This patch is for core-updates branch, and allows bootstrap tarball generation by guix build --target=powerpc-linux-gnu bootstrap-tarballs I think the b
I had to work on the core-updates branch, or in the past on the wip-gcc7 branch. I mentioned this some month ago. The current branch has an outdated gcc version. Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> skri
Hi! Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> skribis: Sure but that’s the next step. My question was about the triplet you passed to ‘--target’ when cross-compiling from your Intel(?) machine, but I th
Hi! Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> skribis: Sure but that’s the next step. My question was about the triplet you passed to ‘--target’ when cross-compiling from your Intel(?) machine, but I th
Am Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:03:25AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Enge: Things improve! I could reenable sjd-p9 by a little "guix gc". Thanks to Ricardo for walking me through a few cuirass steps! So we have
Hi, I've rebased wip-ppc64le again just now onto the latest core-updates. There were no conflicts. Because I committed 5d2863dfe4613d5091e61800fcd5a48922c8ce4e and 001fc29b43fd0beb365d536774fae966243
As noted in another thread this would involve updating gcc to gcc-8. There are some other patches which could go straight into master (I'm looking at libelf specifically, probably others), but glibc
"regular powerpc", ie macppc/ppc32/powerpc-linux-gnu, does have some bootstrap binaries built but isn't near ready for merging. Go ahead and make any changes necessary. -- Efraim Flashner <efraim@fla
(See <https://bugs.gnu.org/45252#19> for my earlier message). Since writing the message above, I've found another problem in the same commit (7eaa2f24ea77cddbb4bbc2d6a6905673a36f8f99): it searches fo
Ok, 'smallerizing' isn't a real word. I'm trying again to see about porting Guix to 32-bit powerpc and I've come across a problem with the static guile. static guile has bin/ share/ and lib/ outputs.
On 5/5/19 4:49 PM, Tobias Platen wrote:>> Ludovic, on behalf of the Guix team. Oh thats nice to know, but it runs then apparently in 32bit PowerPC Big Endian or?
Hi, I just encountered the following single test failure building on powerpc64le: --8<--cut here--start-->8-- time certutil -K -d /tmp/guix-build-nss-3.99.0.drv-0/nss-3.99/tests_results/security/loca
The problem described by #70663 has now been fixed on master through the changes in #70693. The general point I was making though is that if we can improve tooling and processes so that problems are
Hi, To give some specific issues, I've run up against the recent issues with nss [1][2] and I don't think we could release with the nss package as is currently. 1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70662 2
Hi, [...] As discussed on IRC, I would suggest one file per security fix, with “CVE-xyz” in the file name so that ‘guix lint’ can recognize it. But if that’s too tedious/inconvenient, let