guix-devel archive search

Results:

References: [ printing: 274 ]

Total 274 documents matching your query.

261. Hydra time out (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 23:22:12 +0200; gcc-objc++-4.8.2.mips64el-linux fails to be built because of: building of `/gnu/store/avdn8phqm44v33p6k42pipybcgjs92mb-gcc-objc++-4.8.2.drv' timed out after 72000 seconds @ build-failed /gnu/store/av; /archive/html/guix-devel/2014-06/msg00012.html (5,281 bytes)
262. [PATCH] gnu: Add guile-json. (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 20:21:24 +0200; * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-json): New variable. -- gnu/packages/guile.scm | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/guile.scm b/gnu/packages/guile.; /archive/html/guix-devel/2014-03/msg00357.html (5,513 bytes)
263. Re: GNUnet build failure on mips64el (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 09:46:54 +0100; These warnings are likely caused due to the system getting overloaded. The testcase has a test ramp-up part which starts 2 peers and then connects them. This part is failing as peers are unable to co; /archive/html/guix-devel/2014-02/msg00305.html (8,269 bytes)
264. Re: GNUnet build failure on mips64el (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 02:44:03 -0500; I tried this, and it fails with similar output: --8<--cut here--start-->8-- make check-TESTS make[1]: Entering directory '/home/mhw/build/gnunet-0.10.0/src/revocation' Creating an ego revoc_test Test; /archive/html/guix-devel/2014-02/msg00304.html (8,418 bytes)
265. [PATCH] gnu: Add paperkey. (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 10:55:42 -0600; * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (paperkey): New variable. -- gnu/packages/gnupg.scm | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm b/gnu/package; /archive/html/guix-devel/2014-02/msg00085.html (6,134 bytes)
266. Re: The Nixpkgs Monitor (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:54:49 +0100; What is the particular problem? For ffmpeg, for instance, the uri reads (uri (string-append "http://www.ffmpeg.org/releases/ffmpeg-" version ".tar.bz2")) which gets expanded into "http://www.ffmpeg.o; /archive/html/guix-devel/2014-01/msg00147.html (6,264 bytes)
267. [PATCH 2/6 v3] gnu: gtk+: enable introspection. (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:43:11 +0100; * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (atk, gdk-pixbuf, gtk+, pango): enable introspection * guix/build/gnome.scm: New file. -- Makefile.am | 1 + gnu/packages/glib.scm | 5 ++++- gnu/packages/gtk.scm | 43 ++++++++++; /archive/html/guix-devel/2013-12/msg00058.html (12,280 bytes)
268. [PATCH 2/6 v2] gnu: gtk+: enable introspection. (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:32:17 +0100; * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (atk, gdk-pixbuf, gtk+, pango): enable introspection * guix/build/gnome.scm: New file. -- Makefile.am | 1 + gnu/packages/glib.scm | 3 ++- gnu/packages/gtk.scm | 41 ++++++++++++; /archive/html/guix-devel/2013-12/msg00043.html (11,957 bytes)
269. Re: a2ps: manpages fail to build (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:30:56 +0200; Nikita Karetnikov <address@hidden> skribis: There’s a bug in its build system, but most likely it wants ‘help2man’ (as native input.) No it’s not. :-) If you have a strong argument, tell Karl; /archive/html/guix-devel/2013-10/msg00087.html (7,351 bytes)
270. Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add tools for sysadmins: htop and dfc. (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 01:52:39 +0400; The pretty-printing rule is described in SICP. Search for “There is no limit” [1]. However, that paragraph doesn’t say what to do when the line is too long. I’m trying to keep lines under 79; /archive/html/guix-devel/2013-08/msg00146.html (8,969 bytes)
271. Re: Guile 2.0.5, HTTP downloads, and progress reports (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:06:54 +0200; Am Mittwoch, 21. August 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: Indeed, this prints ;;; ("2.0.5-deb+1-3") My report may have been wrong, as it appears that I did not correctly install the newest guix version.; /archive/html/guix-devel/2013-08/msg00052.html (10,354 bytes)
272. Re: Guile 2.0.5, HTTP downloads, and progress reports (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 14:41:48 +0200; Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis: What do the following print? guile -c '(use-modules (guix utils)) (pk (version>? (version) "2.0.5"))' guile -c '(pk (version))' My guess is that (version) retur; /archive/html/guix-devel/2013-08/msg00050.html (6,684 bytes)
273. Re: Guile 2.0.5, HTTP downloads, and progress reports (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:08:00 +0200; Am Mittwoch, 21. August 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: As far as I can tell, nothing changed, I still get the progress report. Andreas; /archive/html/guix-devel/2013-08/msg00049.html (5,341 bytes)
274. Re: Guile 2.0.5, HTTP downloads, and progress reports (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:47:45 +0200; address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: Commit db90b40 partially addresses this by removing the fake progress report on Guile 2.0.5, and by printing “please wait” (and “please upgrade”). F; /archive/html/guix-devel/2013-08/msg00048.html (5,754 bytes)

Current List: 261 - 274
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]