[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoconf and OS/2
From: |
Andreas Buening |
Subject: |
Re: autoconf and OS/2 |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:18:43 +0200 |
Tim Van Holder wrote:
>
> > In my opinion a additional configure option would be the best solution
> > (or a documented environment variable if you like). Why? It doesn't
>
> Well, config.site is merely a way to set such documented evironment
> variables (and undocumented ones as well); with the
> ac_executable_extensions patch, you could simply do
>
> set ac_executable_extensions=".exe .bat .cmd"
> sh configure
>
> and it would work (without relying on --prefix).
And I'd like to see this patch in the official distribution.
[snip]
> Yes, but
> a) most systems that use \ also support / (DJGPP, Cygwin)
> b) checking \ requires quoting the \ properly, which is harder
> if it's in a variable that might just have a / - so [\\/] is used
> wherever it's needed. This is not optimal (a Unix path with an
> embedded backslash won't work properly), but it's probably the best
> we can do. I will try to look into the PATH issue at some point in
> the near future, but I would recommend using a config.site and
> massaging $PATH there yourself.
In my opinion it would be sufficient to test if there are any (forward)
slashes in $PATH and to print a warning if there isn't a slash.
Then the user knows what he has to do.
bye,
Andreas
- autoconf and OS/2, Andreas Büning, 2001/06/15
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, Tim Van Holder, 2001/06/15
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, Andreas Buening, 2001/06/15
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, Tim Van Holder, 2001/06/15
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, Akim Demaille, 2001/06/18
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, Andreas Buening, 2001/06/18
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, Tim Van Holder, 2001/06/19
- Re: autoconf and OS/2,
Andreas Buening <=
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, Tim Van Holder, 2001/06/22
Re: autoconf and OS/2, Akim Demaille, 2001/06/18