[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: non portable sed scripts
From: |
Tim Rice |
Subject: |
Re: non portable sed scripts |
Date: |
Mon, 22 May 2006 21:12:48 -0700 (PDT) |
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Switching to awk sounds like a win to me, as awk is more expressive
> than sed is. In the old days this would have been problematic due to
> the incompatibilities between traditional and POSIX Awk, but nowadays
> we can assume an almost-POSIX-complaint awk, if we run AC_PROG_AWK.
Switching to awk sounds scary to me. It's quite easy to break
awk on OpenServer.
I've got some info on limits of awk from a SCO engineer on OpenServer
& UnixWare that may be usefull if you switch to awk.
OSR5 awk has an input record limit of 3K bytes.
UW7 awk has an input record limit of 5K
And the awk string limit -- 401 limit in OSR5, 5K limit in UW7.
--
Tim Rice Multitalents (707) 887-1469
address@hidden
- Re: non portable sed scripts, (continued)
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/21
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/22
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/22
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Stepan Kasal, 2006/05/22
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/22
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Stepan Kasal, 2006/05/22
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/22
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Stepan Kasal, 2006/05/22
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/22
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/23
- Re: non portable sed scripts,
Tim Rice <=
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Stepan Kasal, 2006/05/23
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/23
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Tim Rice, 2006/05/23
Re: non portable sed scripts, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/23
Re: non portable sed scripts, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/23