[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: braced variable expansion in here documents
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: braced variable expansion in here documents |
Date: |
Thu, 25 May 2006 21:26:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
Hello,
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 01:37:11AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> If we can come up with something nicer that still avoids the bugs,
> that'd be good. But let's not revert the patch until we have
> something nicer in hand.
sure, that's a good rule.
First, let me mention what I see as the main disadvantage of your
patch: config.status is less readable with all those expansions.
And two two levels of here-documents make status.m4 difficult to
read, so looking into a generated config.status is often useful.
``something nicer'' I would like to add a check which would rule out
shells with this bugs from the ``better shell'' selection.
If I understand it correctly, there is always another usable shell on
the affected machines.
I'll prepare a patch later.
Stepan Kasal
Re: non portable sed scripts, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/23
Re: non portable sed scripts, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/23
Re: braced variable expansion in here documents, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/25
Re: non portable sed scripts, Tim Rice, 2006/05/25
Re: non portable sed scripts, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/23