[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH
From: |
Bernard Dautrevaux |
Subject: |
RE: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Feb 2001 18:59:45 +0100 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akim Demaille [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 7:09 PM
> To: Earnie Boyd
> Cc: Tim Van Holder; address@hidden;
> Alexandre Oliva
> Subject: Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH
>
>
> Earnie Boyd <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > There is a caveat to "would work". If I have executable foo.exe and
> > directory foo then both tests returns false. Given this, I
> don't see
> > anyway out of `((test -x foo.exe && test -f foo.exe) ||
> (test -x foo &&
> > test -f foo))'.
>
> Hm, I have some hesitations...
>
> Should I ``Bwa ha ha'', or ``Boo hoo hoo''?
>
For now I "Beuh euh euh..."
--------------------------------------------
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess Ingenierie
97 bis, rue de Colombes
92400 COURBEVOIE
FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0) 1 47 68 80 80
Fax: +33 (0) 1 47 88 97 85
e-mail: address@hidden
address@hidden
--------------------------------------------
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, (continued)
RE: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Tim Van Holder, 2001/02/04
Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/02
RE: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH,
Bernard Dautrevaux <=