[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFI: Trailing blanks
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: RFI: Trailing blanks |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:54:47 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 21:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
>
> I don't fully understand all the issues involved with line smashing,
> but I tend to agree that it's relatively important to remove multiple
Sorry, I meant to write "relatively *un*important".
> blank lines from the output. If that gets in the way of more
> important goals, we should leave the blank lines alone.
- RFI: Trailing blanks, Akim Demaille, 2001/08/17
- Re: RFI: Trailing blanks, Raja R Harinath, 2001/08/17
- Re: RFI: Trailing blanks, Paul Eggert, 2001/08/17
- Re: RFI: Trailing blanks, Akim Demaille, 2001/08/17
- Re: RFI: Trailing blanks, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/08/17
- Re: RFI: Trailing blanks, akim, 2001/08/18
- Re: RFI: Trailing blanks, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/08/18
- Re: RFI: Trailing blanks, Paul Eggert, 2001/08/22
- Re: RFI: Trailing blanks,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: RFI: Trailing blanks, Akim Demaille, 2001/08/27
- Re: RFI: Trailing blanks, Akim Demaille, 2001/08/27
- Re: RFI: Trailing blanks, Paul Eggert, 2001/08/27
- Re: RFI: Trailing blanks, Akim Demaille, 2001/08/29
- Re: Algol 68 (was: RFI: Trailing blanks), Paul Eggert, 2001/08/29