[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: vishnu
Subject: Re: PCCTS?
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:53:56 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.20i

On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 03:43:54PM -0400, Dale E Martin wrote:
> > > And I also have a fallback that can use an environment variable PCCTSROOT:
> > 
> > That's not too bad.  What would be cool is if pccts installed a pkg-config
> > specification.
> I don't know what you mean by this, but if I knew I could probably help
> make it happen upstream.  Could you elaborate for me?

See <>

This is what glib/gtk+ are using now.

> > i'm just using C (not C++).  Is there really that much boilerplate support
> > code to justify creating a library?
> Well, there are a few files and they have to be compiled.  In my mind that
> justifies a library.  Otherwise everyone handles this problem slightly
> differently - either copying the code in and getting out of sync from time
> to time, or something else.
> > Dunno.  i'm pretty satisfied already. 
> Yes, the current Makefile seems to work fairly well - it's just the lack of
> a standard place for the headers and the "precompilable" stuff that is the
> minor annoyance I see.  A "make install" could address both of those
> issues.

Hrm.  How about automake support?

Victory to the Divine Mother!!   ... after all, why compete?      

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]