[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: backward compatability of tools
From: |
Thomas E. Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: backward compatability of tools |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Feb 2003 06:22:49 -0500 (EST) |
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Paul Eggert wrote:
> "Dr. David Kirkby" <address@hidden> writes:
> This is not a question of invalid user input. This is a question of
> bugs in the operating system. Autoconf-generated scripts, no matter
> how well-written, cannot survive arbitrary OS bugs.
typical response from Eggert (would be nice if he didn't keep making
excuses, but you're not likely to find it changing).
--
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
- Re: 1,000 year backward compatability of tools, (continued)
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Eric Siegerman, 2003/02/19
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Paul Eggert, 2003/02/19
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Eric Siegerman, 2003/02/19
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Bruce Korb, 2003/02/19
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Roger Leigh, 2003/02/20
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/02/21
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Paul Eggert, 2003/02/21
- Re: backward compatability of tools,
Thomas E. Dickey <=
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/02/21
- Re: backward compatability of tools, John Burger, 2003/02/21
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/02/22
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Paul Eggert, 2003/02/23
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/02/23
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Paul Eggert, 2003/02/23
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/02/23
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Paul Eggert, 2003/02/23
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/02/24