[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta]
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta] |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:33:03 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) |
On Friday 02 March 2012 11:09:13 Olaf Lenz wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 05:45 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > The Autoconf team is considering releasing only .xz files for 2.69;
> > if this would be a hardship for you, and you need the .gz or .bz2
> > release, please speak up now.
>
> I want to second Bob Friesenhahn's opinion that it would be nice to keep
> at least a .gz release version. The xz-utils are not part of all
> standard distributions yet (I can just name the current Sabayon Linux
> and openSUSE 11.3), so I would prefer it if a standard tool like autoconf
> would not depend on it.
uhh, Sabayon does have xz-utils and has for quite a long time now. after all,
it's simply Gentoo at its core, and Gentoo has had xz-utils for a long time.
openSUSE has had xz-utils since 11.2. before that, they had lzma-utils.
so do you have any other distros to list ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- autoconf-2.68b released [beta], Eric Blake, 2012/03/01
- Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta], Olaf Lenz, 2012/03/02
- Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta], Eric Blake, 2012/03/02
- Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta], Rhys Ulerich, 2012/03/02
- Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta], Eric Blake, 2012/03/02
- Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta], Paul Eggert, 2012/03/02
- Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta], Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/03/02
- Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta], Paul Eggert, 2012/03/02
Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta],
Mike Frysinger <=
Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta], Tim Rice, 2012/03/02
Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta], Mike Frysinger, 2012/03/02
Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta], Stefano Lattarini, 2012/03/20