[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects
From: |
Bruce Korb |
Subject: |
Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:44:28 -0700 |
Dean Povey wrote:
> The easiest way would be for ./configure to find the C compiler and build
> a simple utility binary from source, then use that for the rest of the
> configuration.
Problem is that by the time you've figured out how to do that,
you're most the way done. Now, if you depended upon that
binary being pre-installed, then you're most the way done
before you even begin. :-)
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, (continued)
Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Pavel Roskin, 2002/10/13
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Tom Lord, 2002/10/13
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Bruce Korb, 2002/10/13
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Glenn McGrath, 2002/10/13
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Soren A, 2002/10/15
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Dean Povey, 2002/10/14
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Glenn McGrath, 2002/10/14
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects,
Bruce Korb <=
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Andreas Buening, 2002/10/14
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Soren A, 2002/10/15
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Bernd Jendrissek, 2002/10/15
Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Peter Eisentraut, 2002/10/15
Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Peter Eisentraut, 2002/10/18