[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: automake -vs- huge projects

From: Lars Hecking
Subject: Re: automake -vs- huge projects
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:55:38 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5i

Paul D. Smith writes:
> %% Bob Friesenhahn <address@hidden> writes:
>   bf> Per-subdirectory rules and definitions can be added in order to
>   bf> significantly reduce the amount of redundant code, and to
>   bf> re-enable the capability to usefully override parts of the default
>   bf>
> Not if you want to continue to generate portable makefiles.
> There is no way in POSIX make (for example) to generate a target in a
> subdirectory using a suffix rule.

 What about an automake option then to generate Makefiles for GNU make?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]