[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: How about "C": AVR306 for GCC
|
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: How about "C": AVR306 for GCC |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:06:03 +0100 (MET) |
"WAKAME, Nobukazu" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> What do you need to translate? Just replace the first form by the
>
> I mean rewrite.
Yes, but you've already isolated both parts excellently, so all you
need to do is to replace the #pragma and the function heading of your
first piece by the one using SIGNAL().
> All I have to study is learn more "C", I presume.
Nope, interrupt logic is unfortunately not generic C but always
compiler dependant.
--
J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer
address@hidden http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
- [avr-gcc-list] AVR223 for GCC, ramnath, 2003/02/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR223 for GCC, ramnath, 2003/02/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR223 for GCC, Joerg Wunsch, 2003/02/17
- [avr-gcc-list] How about "C": AVR306 for GCC, WAKAME, Nobukazu, 2003/02/27
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] How about "C": AVR306 for GCC, Joerg Wunsch, 2003/02/27
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: How about "C": AVR306 for GCC, WAKAME, Nobukazu, 2003/02/27
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: How about "C": AVR306 for GCC,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: How about "C": AVR306 for GCC, WAKAME, Nobukazu, 2003/02/27
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: How about "C": AVR306 for GCC, Sander Pool, 2003/02/27
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: How about "C": AVR306 for GCC, WAKAME, Nobukazu, 2003/02/27
[avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR223 for GCC, WAKAME, Nobukazu, 2003/02/25
Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR223 for GCC, ramnath, 2003/02/27