[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avr-gcc-list] Re: How about "C": AVR306 for GCC
From: |
WAKAME, Nobukazu |
Subject: |
[avr-gcc-list] Re: How about "C": AVR306 for GCC |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:33:50 +0900 |
Mr."Joerg Wunsch"
WAKAME, mailing from Japan in the morning.
As "Joerg Wunsch" wrote in
Subject:Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: How about "C": AVR306 for GCC
<Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:06:03 +0100 (MET)>
<address@hidden>
> Yes, but you've already isolated both parts excellently, so all you
> need to do is to replace the #pragma and the function heading of your
> first piece by the one using SIGNAL().
I understand it.
> Nope, interrupt logic is unfortunately not generic C but always
> compiler dependant.
O I C !
I checked sig-avr.h ,and I can understand it.
MANY thanks.
--
+-------- WAKAME, Nob<address@hidden> -- Motion Control ----+
| Coral Systems Inc. since 1979 |
| JA1FMZ, MoroisoYachtOwnersClub, exJapanMotorGliderClub |
+-------- http://www.CoralSystems.com/ -- (in Japaneese) ----+
- [avr-gcc-list] AVR223 for GCC, ramnath, 2003/02/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR223 for GCC, ramnath, 2003/02/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR223 for GCC, Joerg Wunsch, 2003/02/17
- [avr-gcc-list] How about "C": AVR306 for GCC, WAKAME, Nobukazu, 2003/02/27
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] How about "C": AVR306 for GCC, Joerg Wunsch, 2003/02/27
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: How about "C": AVR306 for GCC, WAKAME, Nobukazu, 2003/02/27
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: How about "C": AVR306 for GCC, Joerg Wunsch, 2003/02/27
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: How about "C": AVR306 for GCC,
WAKAME, Nobukazu <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: How about "C": AVR306 for GCC, Sander Pool, 2003/02/27
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: How about "C": AVR306 for GCC, WAKAME, Nobukazu, 2003/02/27
[avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR223 for GCC, WAKAME, Nobukazu, 2003/02/25
Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR223 for GCC, ramnath, 2003/02/27