[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] error with optimized boolean logic in gcc
From: |
Sean D'Epagnier |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] error with optimized boolean logic in gcc |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Nov 2011 00:01:22 +1300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:18:17AM +0100, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> >
> >In avr.md I changed:
> > return "sbi %i0,%2";
> >to
> > return "sbi %i0-0x20,%2";
> >
> >It fixed the problem. I think this needs to be done all over the place
>
> This is an incorrect fix, the problem must be somewhere else.
>
Indeed, I didn't like it much, but it helped me understand the problem.
> %i shall subtract avr_current_arch->sfr_offset which is 0x20 for all
> architectures. The reason to use %i and not %m is to avoid magic
> numbers 0x20 all over the place, see top of following changeset and
> %i implementation in avr.c:print_operand()
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=181552
>
> + else if (code == 'i')
> + {
> + if (!io_address_operand (addr, GET_MODE (x)))
> + fatal_insn ("bad address, not an I/O address:", addr);
> +
> + switch (INTVAL (addr))
> + {
> + case RAMPZ_ADDR: fprintf (file, "__RAMPZ__"); break;
> + case SREG_ADDR: fprintf (file, "__SREG__"); break;
> + case SP_ADDR: fprintf (file, "__SP_L__"); break;
> + case SP_ADDR+1: fprintf (file, "__SP_H__"); break;
> +
> + default:
> + fprintf (file, HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_HEX,
> + UINTVAL (addr) - avr_current_arch->sfr_offset);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
>
This makes a lot more sense now, but the above code is never reached.
If you go a bit higher up in the function you will see:
else if (GET_CODE (x) == CONST_INT)
-> fprintf (file, HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC, INTVAL (x) + abcd);
else if (GET_CODE (x) == MEM)
{
...
bit of code from above
...
}
code is indeed 'i', but GET_CODE(x) is CONST_INT not MEM, so the conversion
never takes place.
We could of course perform the conversion in both places, but I don't
really like that either. Maybe perform the subraction earlier as for abcd?
Sean