[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Axiom-developer] Re: libspad.a, cfuns-c.o sockio-c.c and friends
From: |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
Subject: |
[Axiom-developer] Re: libspad.a, cfuns-c.o sockio-c.c and friends |
Date: |
18 Sep 2006 04:55:08 +0200 |
root <address@hidden> writes:
| > My understanding, from reading src/lib/Makefile.pamphlet, is that
| > sockio-c.o is contained in libspad.a. So why is it specified again
| > in lsp/Makefile.pamphlet when building a fresh lisp image from GCL?
| >
| > Also, is there a reason why cfuns-c.o is not archived in libspad.a?
|
| cfuns-c.o and sockio-c.o get linked directly into the lisp image.
| they are required to be part of the image so axiom can talk to sman,
| the superman process that managed communication with hyperdoc and
| graphics.
Yes, but then what about the copy of cfuns-c.o in libspad.a (which is
also specified along with cfuns-c.o)?
I guess another way to phrase my question is what is the difference
between specifying an object file directly, from as included via
libspad.a?
-- Gaby