> Martin Ruber wrote:
>> I have the feeling that "trunk" and "branches" is somewhat unfitting
>> for the Axiom project. Currently, wh-sandbox seems most useable to me.
Bill Page wrote:
> Although no one has named it as such, I think effectively we have the
> situation of a "fork" in the Axiom sources.
Tim pointed out to me that he has previously written to the email list
about this. He says that when one joins an open source project and
wants to "contribute" then it it is your responsibility to make sure
that your work gets merged into the main line (first Method above).
But no one has done this. And we now see 3 different things being
called "axiom"... Gold, build-Improvements and wh-sandbox. He says
this is a "fork" because there is no acknowledgment that this work
should go back into the main line.
I am afraid that Tim might be right about this, although I do think
there has been *some* acknowledgment that these changes *should* go
back into the main line.