Re: [Bayonne-devel] Sangoma drivers

[David Sugar]

Right now I am trying an experiment with libpri 1.2.1 and pushing the
pri_internal.h and pri_q931.h headers external from that, then building
libsangoma.  Yes, I think either having it in hardware or, so long as it
has different build requirements, having a fork integrated directly into
libsangoma, would be best, as it eliminates the potential conflicts that
currently exist.

Brian West wrote:

>
> On Jan 4, 2006, at 11:08 AM, David Sugar wrote:
>
>>
>> This driver uses an older version of libpri, but a varient build which
>> exposes the pri_internal.h header.  It is a shame they didn't  choose to
>> just fork it and have it under a different link library name and 
>> include
>> directory by default, as it is sure to cause conflicts with those who
>> have installed libpri for asterisk.  Of course its still beta, so  maybe
>> they will resolve this issue later.
>
>
> We are working with Nenad on this at some point we either hope to 
> have the q931 in hardware or fork the code and make it part of 
> libsangoma as you pointed out.
>
> /b
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bayonne-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bayonne-devel

dyfet.vcf
Description: Vcard