[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glr.c: Token definitions
|
From: |
Akim Demaille |
|
Subject: |
Re: glr.c: Token definitions |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:06:35 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> "Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:
>> What if the #define's disappear for %pure-parser?
> But whether to use #define is independent of whether the parser is pure.
> Instead, how about if we make the #define's disappear when the --yacc
> (-y) option is not used?
Am I understanding, from your proposal, that it is POSIX that mandates
the #defines?
- glr.c: Token definitions, Akim Demaille, 2005/09/19
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/19
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/19
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/19
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/20
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/21
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Akim Demaille, 2005/09/21
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/21
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/23
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/23
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/21
Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Akim Demaille, 2005/09/20