[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: glr: include the created header

From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: glr: include the created header
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 18:04:07 +0200

Le 16 juin 06 à 18:32, Joel E. Denny a écrit :

On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Akim Demaille wrote:

"Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:

How about if we call them both "%defines" and decide which is which
depending on context?  That would match %{...%}'s behavior.

Since we are looking for a new syntax, I would prefer to make it
clearer and independent of the order.  For a start, it will also help
make things more understandable when we have an %import feature.

Although I'm not sure how %import will go, I was also concerned about how
my first patch would limit it.

The more I think about it, the more I like a simple solution which does
rely on %union to distinguish cases.  Even when we have %import we will
still be able to distinguish them.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]