[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: push parser

From: Bob Rossi
Subject: Re: push parser
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:06:32 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14

On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 06:30:14PM -0500, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> >  2006-12-20  Joel E. Denny  <address@hidden>
> >  
> > +   Enable push parsers to operate in impure mode.  Thus, %push-parser no
> > +   longer implies %pure-parser.  The point of this change is to move
> > +   towards being able to test the push parser code by running the entire
> > +   test suite as if %push-parser had been declared.
> Another advantage of this patch is that it eliminates any debate over how 
> a %pure-parser should be handled when there's a %push-parser.  That is, 
> %pure-parser now has an obvious meaning.
> Paul, is this one ok with you?

Hi Joel,

If you have a lot of patches that make up the final patch, you should
run the final patch through the benchmark script we were using. Just to
make sure that all of the new modes don't effect the speed of the
pure/unpure pull parsers.

I can dig up the script that Akim posted if you aren't familiar with it.

Bob Rossi

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]