[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Initial %include implementation
From: |
Egor Pugin |
Subject: |
Re: Initial %include implementation |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:08:30 +0300 |
> Let '#include' die, welcome ‘import'.
I see.
But, isn't include and import could be orthogonal in bison?
It's nice to have common prologues/epilogues, also parts of grammar,
as you said.
Maybe %include is nice to have feature, before future possible imports?
People, who won't be using it, won't get any negative effects.
--
Egor Pugin
- Initial %include implementation, Egor Pugin, 2018/11/08
- Re: Initial %include implementation, Akim Demaille, 2018/11/10
- Re: Initial %include implementation,
Egor Pugin <=
- Re: Initial %include implementation, Akim Demaille, 2018/11/11
- Re: Initial %include implementation, Egor Pugin, 2018/11/11
- Re: Initial %include implementation, David M. Warme, 2018/11/17
- Re: Initial %include implementation, Akim Demaille, 2018/11/20
- Re: Initial %include implementation, David M. Warme, 2018/11/26