[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in the parser?
From: |
Jay Foad |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in the parser? |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:33:24 +0000 |
On 25 November 2014 at 14:06, Jay Foad <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 25 November 2014 at 13:38, Juergen Sauermann
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I have read the IBM binding rules a number of times but they seem not to
>> help. The problem of these rules is
>> that they give different results in the cases where / is an operator and
>> where / is a function.
>
> In IBM APL2 / is always an operator.
For example:
1 2/¨3 4 ⍝ GNU APL, NARS2000 and Dyalog: parse as 1 2(/¨)3 4
3 4 4
1 2/¨3 4 ⍝ APL2: parse as (1 2/)¨3 4
3 3 3 4 4 4
Jay.