Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in the parser?

[Jay Foad]

Hi Jürgen,

Thanks for doing the analysis.

> 2. Alternatives
> ---------------------
>
> I have tested what happens if we would introduce a M M pattern into GNU APL
> in order to
> get IBM APL2's behavior.

I don't understand this bit. Monadic operators don't bind like this in APL2.

 Surely the way to get APL2 behaviour is:
- never downgrade / to a function
- introduce an A M pattern to allow operators to have arrays as left operands

Jay.