[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-apl] Local variables in lambdas

From: Grant Rettke
Subject: Re: [Bug-apl] Local variables in lambdas
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:31:10 -0500

The first one looks more appealing because it is close to the normal
function declaration syntax.

Grant Rettke

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Juergen Sauermann
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
> Thinking about lambdas once more I had an idea of a syntax for declaring
> local variables in
> the lambda. In order to bring lambdas and proper functions closer together
> rather than separating
> them more than necessary, we could use the same syntax as in proper defined
> functions: a list
> of variable names separated by semicolons. A lambda with body ⍺+⍵ and local
> variables C, D,
> and E would then be declared as:
>       {⍺+⍵;C;D;E}
> One could also think of
>       {C;D;E;⍺+⍵}
> But the first looks more appealing to me. Any opinions?
> /// Jürgen

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]