[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sub shell mit pipes
From: |
Paul Jarc |
Subject: |
Re: Sub shell mit pipes |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:32:46 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Enrique Perez-Terron <enrio@online.no> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 21:29, Paul Jarc wrote:
>> You can do that now, but it's spelled differently:
>> exec < <(commands_1) > >(commands_2)
>
> That is good. However, the docs says the process substitution is
> supported only on systems that support named pipes or the /dev/fd method
> of naming open files.
In the case of redirections, there's no reason in principle why
process substitution couldn't be available anywhere. That could be
added without breaking anything, though I don't know how messy the
code might be. It might be easier with new syntax.
paul
- Sub shell mit pipes, Morard Jean-Louis, 2004/08/11
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Paul Jarc, 2004/08/11
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Enrique Perez-Terron, 2004/08/11
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Paul Jarc, 2004/08/11
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Chet Ramey, 2004/08/11
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Enrique Perez-Terron, 2004/08/11
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Chet Ramey, 2004/08/11
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Enrique Perez-Terron, 2004/08/11
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Paul Jarc, 2004/08/12
- Re: Sub shell mit pipes, Enrique Perez-Terron, 2004/08/12