Re: Bash source repository

[Michael Witten]

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 17:00, Bradley M. Kuhn <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'd suggest that we keep the master branch only to track the history of
> releases and officially released patches as Chet posts them, and then we
> can use separate branches for individual developers who want to use Git.
> What do you think of this idea?

There should perhaps be development branches (like `pu' and `next' in
git's own development model[0]), but I don't like the idea of having
separate PUBLIC branches for individual developers; they can have
their own repositories with their own branches.

I would also like to stress that whatever ends up in `master' should not be
a surprise (that is, the result of private work). There should be a public
progression through development branches and then ultimately a merge (or at
least a cherry-picking) into the master branch.

[0] 
http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/git.git;a=blob_plain;f=MaintNotes;hb=9f1017f6414d81e9dc561c2cc627b6fcd05d57b2