[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bash security issue
|
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: Bash security issue |
|
Date: |
Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:22:19 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
On September 26, 2014 3:53:53 AM EDT, lolilolicon <address@hidden> wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Linda Walsh <address@hidden> wrote:
>> This behavior has been around for 20+ without it being judged "so
>bad",
>
>I don't think that's a sufficient argument for "this is not so bad".
>
>First, the fact that the bug has existed for so long, yet fails to be
>discovered [disclosed] until now, is proof that this feature is very
>little used and rarely tested, not an argument for "it's not so bad".
The question in my mind is, is exporting functions a POSIX shell feature? If
not, perhaps it should just be scrapped altogether.
zw
- Re: Bash security issue, Eric Blake, 2014/09/25
- Re: Bash security issue, Linda Walsh, 2014/09/25
- Re: Bash security issue, Eric Blake, 2014/09/25
- Re: Bash security issue, Linda Walsh, 2014/09/25
- Re: Bash security issue, lolilolicon, 2014/09/26
- Re: Bash security issue,
Zack Weinberg <=
- Re: Bash security issue, Eric Blake, 2014/09/26
- Re: Bash security issue, Steve Simmons, 2014/09/26
- Re: Bash security issue, Greg Wooledge, 2014/09/26
- Re: Bash security issue, Paul Smith, 2014/09/26
- Re: Bash security issue, Chet Ramey, 2014/09/27
- Re: Bash security issue, Eric Blake, 2014/09/27
- Re: Bash security issue, Steve Simmons, 2014/09/27
- Re: Bash security issue, Zack Weinberg, 2014/09/26
- Re: Bash security issue, Nick Bowler, 2014/09/26
- Re: Bash security issue, Eric Blake, 2014/09/26