[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/637] man 1 c++filt footnote 1 is confused
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/637] man 1 c++filt footnote 1 is confused |
Date: |
11 Jan 2005 11:47:00 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-01-11 11:46
-------
Subject: Re: man 1 c++filt footnote 1 is confused
Hi err, timeless,
> i hate to ask, but when you say MS-DOS, what do you actually mean?
I had meant "any toolchain that is built to run on an MS-DOS system".
> Does it include windows nt?
As a *host* for a toolchain that produces binaries that should run under
MS-DOS, then the answer would be "yes".
> Under NT, things can be case sensitive, so if i told someone
> CXXFILT and they were using a case sensitive system (either because they used
> cygwin shell, or because they really liked running in the posix shell) then
> things wouldn't work....
True, but the actual text of the (patched) footnote is:
MS-DOS does not allow + characters in file names, so on
MS-DOS this program is named CXXFILT.
So the footnote is specific to running the command under MS-DOS. If the
cxxfilt command has been built to run on an NT *host* (but to demangle
binaries produced for an MS-DOS *target*) then the footnote does not
apply and the command's name, as specified throughout the rest of the
man page, will be "c++filt".
Cheers
Nick
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=637
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug binutils/637] New: man 1 c++filt footnote 1 is confused, timeless at myrealbox dot com, 2005/01/05
- [Bug binutils/637] man 1 c++filt footnote 1 is confused, bje at sources dot redhat dot com, 2005/01/09
- [Bug binutils/637] man 1 c++filt footnote 1 is confused, nickc at redhat dot com, 2005/01/10
- [Bug binutils/637] man 1 c++filt footnote 1 is confused, bje at sources dot redhat dot com, 2005/01/10
- [Bug binutils/637] man 1 c++filt footnote 1 is confused, nickc at redhat dot com, 2005/01/11
- [Bug binutils/637] man 1 c++filt footnote 1 is confused, nickc at redhat dot com, 2005/01/11
- [Bug binutils/637] man 1 c++filt footnote 1 is confused, timeless at myrealbox dot com, 2005/01/11
- [Bug binutils/637] man 1 c++filt footnote 1 is confused, bje at sources dot redhat dot com, 2005/01/11
- [Bug binutils/637] man 1 c++filt footnote 1 is confused, nickc at redhat dot com, 2005/01/11
- [Bug binutils/637] man 1 c++filt footnote 1 is confused,
nickc at redhat dot com <=