[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gprof/16027] binutils-2.23.2/gprof: 2 * resource leaks ?
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gprof/16027] binutils-2.23.2/gprof: 2 * resource leaks ? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:13:28 +0000 |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16027
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi Christophe,
> --- Comment #4 from christophe.lyon at st dot com <christophe.lyon at st dot
> com> ---
> Shouldn't we also add corresponding testcases (I'm thinking about the other
> reports about missing 'break': 16022,16023,16026,16027)?
That would be a good idea. I was in a bit of rush yesterday, so I did
not take the time to investigate the possibility of new tests, but if
you would care to have a look that would be wonderful.
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug gprof/16027] New: binutils-2.23.2/gprof: 2 * resource leaks ?, dcb314 at hotmail dot com, 2013/10/09
- [Bug gprof/16027] binutils-2.23.2/gprof: 2 * resource leaks ?, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2013/10/09
- [Bug gprof/16027] binutils-2.23.2/gprof: 2 * resource leaks ?, nickc at redhat dot com, 2013/10/09
- [Bug gprof/16027] binutils-2.23.2/gprof: 2 * resource leaks ?, dcb314 at hotmail dot com, 2013/10/09
- [Bug gprof/16027] binutils-2.23.2/gprof: 2 * resource leaks ?, christophe.lyon at st dot com, 2013/10/10
- [Bug gprof/16027] binutils-2.23.2/gprof: 2 * resource leaks ?, nickc at redhat dot com, 2013/10/10
- [Bug gprof/16027] binutils-2.23.2/gprof: 2 * resource leaks ?,
nickc at redhat dot com <=
- [Bug gprof/16027] binutils-2.23.2/gprof: 2 * resource leaks ?, dcb314 at hotmail dot com, 2013/10/10