bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug ld/23567] much larger static binaries compared to a few months ago


From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Subject: [Bug ld/23567] much larger static binaries compared to a few months ago
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 16:53:38 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567

--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> (In reply to Felix von Leitner from comment #4)
> > Hey Nick, thanks for the quick help!
> > 
> > With -z noseparate-code I'm down to 9512 bytes. That is much better but
> > still more than gold produces. And looking at the binary in a hex editor
> > still shows a ton of padding bytes after .text and .data.
> > 
> 
> Isn't 9512 bytes the same size as in May?
> 
> -rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root         9512 May  2 20:09 /opt/diet/bin/diet
> 
> If you want a smaller binary size than in May, please open a new bug
> report.

BTW, please try -z max-page-size=0x1000.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]