[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle()
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle() |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:35:12 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25180
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi Tim,
(In reply to Tim Rühsen from comment #6)
> the attached patch fixes the demangler slowness (see commit message for a
> description).
Did you run the libiberty testsuite to see if it introduces any new failures ?
Also it would be a good idea to run the g++ testsuite as well, just in case...
Given that you check for "d->d_counting > 1", would it make more sense to make
that field a boolean ? If not, then should the limit be configurable somehow ?
Other than that though the patch looks fine to me, but of course I cannot
approve it. Are you going to submit it to gcc-patches ?
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/25180] New: Slowness in cplus_demangle(), tim.ruehsen at gmx dot de, 2019/11/09
- [Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle(), nickc at redhat dot com, 2019/11/11
- [Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle(), tim.ruehsen at gmx dot de, 2019/11/11
- [Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle(), nickc at redhat dot com, 2019/11/11
- [Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle(), tim.ruehsen at gmx dot de, 2019/11/11
- [Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle(), tim.ruehsen at gmx dot de, 2019/11/12
- [Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle(), tim.ruehsen at gmx dot de, 2019/11/12
- [Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle(),
nickc at redhat dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle(), tim.ruehsen at gmx dot de, 2019/11/12
- [Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle(), nickc at redhat dot com, 2019/11/12