[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no
From: |
slyich at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support) |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Sep 2022 17:07:14 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29547
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich <slyich at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Nick Alcock from comment #1)
> Adding an exit status test seems like a good idea, yes. I'll do that in the
> next few days (busy, but this is easy and machine time is cheap).
>
> I don't have access to a Darwin machine and the compile farm obviously
> doesn't have any -- could you check that the result works once I have
> something?
Yeah, I should be able to test possible fixes.
> (The reason for the oddness of this test is simply that we have to run nm on
> *something*, and many implementations forbid running it on /dev/null, and
> *correct* output on every implementation I have seen includes the file name.
> Of course, multi-line error messages might too... oops. I hope an exit
> status test will suffice to avoid that.)
Oh, would it also fail if nm happens to be a shell wrapper itself? I was about
to wrap it for another unrelated reason.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug libctf/29547] New: binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), slyich at gmail dot com, 2022/09/04
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), slyich at gmail dot com, 2022/09/04
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/05
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support),
slyich at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/05
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/13
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/13
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/13
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), slyich at gmail dot com, 2022/09/14
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/20
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), slyich at gmail dot com, 2022/09/20
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/21
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/21