[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no
From: |
slyich at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support) |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Sep 2022 22:45:43 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29547
--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich <slyich at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Nick Alcock from comment #7)
> (Sorry for delay: post-conf collapse, UK bank holiday, massive change of
> monitor configuration meaning my displays were scattered all around the
> room for a day, etc)
>
> On 14 Sep 2022, slyich at gmail dot com outgrape:
>
> > checking for BSD- or MS-compatible name lister (nm)... =============
> > error:
> > /nix/store/kpc4vpii3zrnz53b87xvid0rxlqb66cc-cctools-binutils-darwin-949.0.1/bin/nm:
> > invalid argument -B
> > Usage:
> > /nix/store/kpc4vpii3zrnz53b87xvid0rxlqb66cc-cctools-binutils-darwin-949.0.1/bin/nm
> > [-agnopruUmxjlfAP[s segname sectname] [-] [-t format] [[-arch <arch_flag>]
> > ...]
> > [file ...]
> > =============
>
> Oh, multiple lines ending with a usage message, and with the last line
> citing the name of the running binary? OK, we can trigger on 'Usage: '
> then. (Ew. Still, most unlikely to be a word that appears on the last
> line of a legitimate run. This function *really* needs a proper rewrite...)
>
> Try the branch now? (Tested locally as before, plus on mingw.)
Tried against commit f71e2751ed8db0f041f9e46487 "fixup! libtool.m4: adjust
kludge for ignoring syntax errors".
Seems to build binutils just fine! Detected `nm -p` command option.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug libctf/29547] New: binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), slyich at gmail dot com, 2022/09/04
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), slyich at gmail dot com, 2022/09/04
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/05
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), slyich at gmail dot com, 2022/09/05
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/05
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/13
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/13
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/13
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), slyich at gmail dot com, 2022/09/14
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/20
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support),
slyich at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/21
- [Bug libctf/29547] binutils-2.39: fails to build against cctools nm (no '-B' option support), nick.alcock at oracle dot com, 2022/09/21