[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: %destructor feedback
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: %destructor feedback |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:45:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Joel" == Joel E Denny <address@hidden> writes:
>> They were still badly formatted by the way :)
> I'm clueless.
> I just tried exporting the second patch from the email I received back
> through the mailing list. I found that applying it perfectly reproduced
> my original code. However, I see that the CVS copy has a number of tabs
> from my original code converted to spaces. I'm guessing all of this also
> holds true for the first patch, but I haven't tried it.
> Could it be something wrong on your end? Did anyone else have a problem
> this time? If it's still me, does anyone have any clue what I could be
> doing wrong?
Actually maybe you sent things right, but I used the mailing archive,
and there, indeed there are no tabs, only spaces (but patch -l does
the trick). A more painful issue is that (in the archive) some lines
are wrapped. E.g., in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2005-12/msg00048.html
@@ -1902,19 +1912,16 @@ yyprocessOneStack (yyGLRStack* yystackp,
break;
}
else
- YYCHK (yyglrReduce (yystackp, yyk, -yyaction,
yyfalse]b4_user_args[));
+ YYCHK (yyglrReduce (yystackp, yyk, -yyaction,
+ yyfalse]b4_user_args[));
}
}
return yyok;
}
- Re: %destructor feedback, (continued)
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/21
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/21
- Re: %destructor feedback,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: %destructor feedback, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/12/21
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/21
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/21
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/22
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/22
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/23
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/27
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/27
- Re: %destructor feedback, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/12/29
Re: %destructor feedback, SteveBravy, 2005/12/22