RE: Bugs and features

[Andrews, Martin]

I agree it would be convenient to test files internal to cfengine. It would
be particularly useful under NT where you might not have test installed
(once again the freakish NT cfengine user sounds off).

Martin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ronan KERYELL [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:46 AM
> To: Frank Ranner
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Bugs and features
> 
...
> The action syntax is not enough orthogonal.  It would simplify a lot
> cfengine scripts if it was possible to define classes if a 
> file does not
> exist, etc. instead of relying on some external /bin/test processes to
> test for that...
> -- 
>     Ronan KERYELL              |\/
>     Labo Informatique Télécom  |/)  Tel:    (+33|0) 2.29.00.14.15
>     ENST Bretagne, BP832       K    Fax:    (+33|0) 2.29.00.12.82
>     29285 BREST CEDEX          |\   E-mail: 
> address@hidden
>     FRANCE                     | \  
> http://www-info.enst-bretagne.fr/~keryell
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-cfengine mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cfengine
>