bug-cfengine
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bugzilla for cfengine


From: Sven Mueller
Subject: Re: Bugzilla for cfengine
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:46:02 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

John Sechrest wrote on 14/12/2004 16:18:

The reason I prefer subversion is the development process I prefer (which is also used by the subversion project itself):

The repository consists of
project/trunk/    - Main development line
project/branches/ - private branches of developers, used to implement
                    bigger changes before getting them into the main
                    line
project/tags/     - release tags

Under project/tags/, there are
*.0.X/            - first tag from trunk to prepare new major release
*.0.X/candidates  - text file containing possible additions to
                    that release, namely:
                    revisions: (revision numbers of commits to trunk)
                    comment: (What those revisions implement)
                    votes: (Votes of developers in favor or against this
                            changeset, change is applied when nobody
                            opposes and at least three developers vote
                            in favor of the change)
*.0.0/            - tagged from *.0.X to do new major release
*.0.*/            - tagged from *.0.X to do a new bugfix release
*.*.X/            - tagged from *.0.X to prepare new minor release,
                    handled the same as *.0.X (including /candidates)
*.*.0/            - tagged from *.*.X to do new minor release
*.*.*/            - tagged from *.*.X to do new bugfix release

non *.*.X tags are never touched again once they have been created.

Combined with the easy merging of changesets from one part of the repository to another (like from /trunk to /tags/1.0.X), this is a very powerful and still stable form of development. And sadly enough, it is almost impossible to use this development style with CVS.

cu,
sven

--
---------------------[ Ciphire Signature ]----------------------
From: address@hidden signed email body (1229 characters)
Date: on 14 December 2004 at 15:46:12 GMT
To:   address@hidden
----------------------------------------------------------------
: The message above has been secured using Ciphire Mail.
: Verify this signature and download your free encryption
: software at www.ciphire.com. The three garbled lines
: below are the sender's verifiable encoded signature.
----------------------------------------------------------------
00fAAAAAEAAADECr9BzQQAABwDAAIAAgACACDujyp7O8DTqcuAj29yUomSaBd6JK
q/N1CO7Jm8PT5PwQEARRR7cyqbKGdhZouquB9oOiXpu/i4je4AHN7stjczdK2MrY
4PudjguNNHPzxcAfjrk2vHit5I2NZrrix26f0I0g==
------------------[ End Ciphire Signed Message ]----------------





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]