RE: Patch: Windows Platform SDK - IPv6 - Borland C++ Builder 6.0 -Windows 2000

[Conrad T. Pino]

Hi David,

> From: David Sugar [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 22:50
> 
> Build Bayonne? :)...The individual demos and test programs generally 
> should be buildable and are fairly easy to follow.  Even the current 
> tests don't act as a full or complete regression, but they should give a 
> generally good idea of whether is something important is broken fairly 
> quickly.

I note ":)" on the Bayonne suggestion as some wishful thinking which I'll
try to accommodate.

I assume you have a Windows box with IPv6 support, the hardware Bayonne
requires whereas I have neither.

I assume you can CVS update from "dev-bcb6-arm" branch and run these tests
far more quickly.  My ignorance of what should be observed may rise to the
level of truly pointless.

This set of suggestions remind me of my college days.  Somewhat specific
and vague at the same time requiring careful thought to translate into an
action plan.  Real education at it's best!!

Unfortunately I must focus most of my thoughts on the deliverables of my
project.  Should you refine these suggestions to a specific recipe I can
execute without much thought then I'll gladly try.
====================================
Progress report:

The last set of Linux builds (Intel & ARM) were done in separate CVS
working directories.  I've discarded both and rebuit both targets from
a single CVS working directory using sub-directories:

        build-arm
        build-x86

Conrad